L&D

Practice what people will do, not what slides say they learned

Corporate learning still measures delivery. Your teams need rooms where knowledge is tested under pressure, debriefed while fresh, and exported in a form enablement can reuse.

Same platform, same facilitator workflow, manager-ready exports across programmes. EN, DE, FA cohorts.

Practice what people will do, not what slides say they learned
The pressure

Completion is not competence

A finished course counts as a result in most LMS dashboards. What matters is whether someone can act well when the room gets hard: hand off work, qualify a decision, teach a colleague, collaborate with an AI agent.

Information is close to free. The scarce skill is judgment under pressure. That cannot be downloaded. It has to be practised in a context where failure is safe and debrief is structured.

The upskilling clarity gap
  • Say workforce needs improved AI skills89%
  • Have begun upskilling meaningfully6%

Most organisations know the skill gap exists. Very few have started closing it with programmes tied to real roles and real practice.

Source: BCG (2024), cited by IBM Institute for Business Value

What breaks

Three failure modes in corporate L&D

  • Content delivery mistaken for learning

    Slides, videos, and quizzes measure recall. Job performance needs practice, reinforcement, and feedback while the experience is still fresh.

  • Training disconnected from the role

    Generic AI workshops teach tool clicks. Teams need mental models and agentic workflows that match how work actually runs in their function.

  • No export enablement can coach to

    Without cohort-level debrief evidence and written commitments, L&D cannot prove transfer or improve the next programme cycle.

The shelf

Formats learning leaders run on one platform

Transfer

Measure what survives from your teaching into the next meeting.

Learn more
Knowledge Management

Knowledge hiding in your team, surfaced on a hex map.

Learn more
AgileOps

Agile flow simulation: learn Kanban through play

Learn more
Onboarding Games

First 90 days as an experience, not a wiki

Learn more
Evidence

Research we design against, and proof we can show

BCG research cited by IBM (2024) found 89% of companies say their workforce needs improved AI skills, but only 6% have begun upskilling in any meaningful way. Not finished. Started.

SHRM (2024) found roughly 1 in 5 organisations believe their current upskilling efforts are working. Common barriers: training irrelevant to roles, no time, content disconnected from real work.

Knoth et al. (2024, peer-reviewed): AI literacy, specifically understanding how AI works in interaction, predicts prompt quality and output quality. Mental model work transfers across tools.

60+
Enterprise organisations since 2016
8
Platform experience types
3
Languages live: EN, DE, FA

Tier A figures from Game Is Serious delivery history. External stats hedged and linked.

Pilot path

How L&D teams usually start

  1. 01

    Meteorite workshop

    Surface hidden knowledge on a hex map. Strong debrief for knowledge-management and ops cohorts.

  2. 02

    Transfer cohort

    Measure what survives when learners teach an AI champion, then watch the meeting they cannot join.

  3. 03

    AgileOps or onboarding

    Flow judgment for delivery teams, or a bespoke onboarding narrative tied to your space and values.

What L&D leaders improve first

  • Proof that knowledge transferred, not just presented
  • Facilitator-ready debriefs with cohort-level signals
  • A multi-language shelf from onboarding to compliance
Read why we build for practice, not content delivery
FAQ

Questions learning leaders ask

Bring your seventh question to the discovery call. We answer in writing first.

  • Which format fits a first L&D pilot?

    Many teams start with Meteorite for knowledge-mapping, Transfer for enablement quality, or AgileOps for operations cohorts. Onboarding programmes often combine a bespoke narrative with one of these mechanics.

  • Do sessions work in EN, DE, and FA?

    Yes. Platform and facilitator materials support English, German, and Farsi cohorts on the same studio stack.

  • What do managers receive?

    Cohort-level debrief themes and written team commitments. No individual quotes in default exports. Deeper assessment available by contract.

  • How is this different from e-learning?

    E-learning optimises completion. We optimise behaviour signals: decisions under pressure, transfer to another person, and debrief evidence your enablement team can reuse.

Browse the experiences catalogue